Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

May v. State

May v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 13, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
926 S.W.2d 724; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414; 1996 WL 453429 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

May v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evi-dentiary hearing. In his Rule 24.035 motion, defendant alleges his trial counsel failed to present certain testimony from certain witnesses at his sentencing hearing. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.