Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Roosevelt Bank v. Lumley

Roosevelt Bank v. Lumley
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 20, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
926 S.W.2d 948; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1436; 1996 WL 469019 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Roosevelt Bank v. Lumley

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Larry D. Lumley and Karen A. Lumley, appeal the judgment sustaining respondent’s, Roosevelt Bank’s, motion for *949summary judgment on its action to recover the balance due on two promissory notes. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84. 1603).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑