State v. Rogers
State v. Rogers
926 S.W.2d 950; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1430; 1996 WL 469186
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Rogers
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Lewis Rogers appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in a correctional facility, saying his motion to represent himself pro se should have been granted.
The judgments are affirmed, because 1) no issues pertaining to the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion are presented, and 2) the motion for pro se representation was not unequivocal and was not timely. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.