Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Klumpp v. Sancegraw

Klumpp v. Sancegraw
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 27, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
927 S.W.2d 575; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1471; 1996 WL 481248 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Klumpp v. Sancegraw

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, pro se, appeals the dismissal of his petition for declaratory judgment so “that he can file and maintain a suit in the United States District Court.” Presumably, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment stating that he has no remedies under Missouri law for deprivation of property, so that he can pursue a claim in federal court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The trial court dismissed his petition. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.