Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Martin v. State

Martin v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 3, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
928 S.W.2d 14; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1505; 1996 WL 495066 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Martin v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In his Rule 24.035 motion, Movant alleges his trial counsel failed to investigate and discuss potential witnesses and the potential outcome of his case if it went to trial. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their in*15formation only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.