Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Balentine

State v. Balentine
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 3, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhaetd
928 S.W.2d 16; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1492; 1996 WL 495113 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Balentine

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, Defendant appeals after his conviction of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender, §§ 558.016 and 558.019, to ten years’ imprisonment. Defendant alleges the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have *17been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursu-ant to Rule 30.25(b).

. All cites are to RSMo 1994.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.