Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Merseal v. State

Merseal v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 10, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
928 S.W.2d 408; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1517; 1996 WL 509984 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Merseal v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.