Manne v. Newmark
Manne v. Newmark
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Wife filed a motion to modify seeking an increase in maintenance. At the conclusion of wife’s evidence, husband moved to dismiss. He alleged wife had not shown changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable, as required by § 452.370.1, RSMo 1994.
The trial court granted the motion. It entered judgment, ordering “each party to pay his/her attorneys’ fees incurred and the costs of his/her discovery and experts.” Wife appeals; we affirm. Husband’s Rule 84.19 motion seeking damages for frivolous appeal is denied.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.