Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Birchfield v. Austin

Birchfield v. Austin
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 17, 1996 · Hoff, Pudlowski, Simon
928 S.W.2d 916; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1563; 1996 WL 523610 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Birchfield v. Austin

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding he was subject to the Workers’ Compensation Law and awarding attorney fees to claimant.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*917The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑