Dooley v. State
Dooley v. State
930 S.W.2d 481; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1610; 1996 WL 556604
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Dooley v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner Dooley appeals from the trial court’s denial of his “NUNC PRO TUNC MOTION TO CORRECT THE ERRONEOUS PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT AS SUBMITTED IN CASE NUMBER CR186-1508FX.” The trial court found that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the relief requested. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.