ORDER

Petitioner appeals the judgment of the trial court denying an administrative D.W.I. trial de novo for reinstatement of his driver’s license after revocation by the Director. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred when it received three exhibits into evidence, in denying his motion for judgment, and in denying his motion to open and amend judgment. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).