Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

Laulo v. Rehm

Laulo v. Rehm
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 22, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
932 S.W.2d 862; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1758; 1996 WL 606553 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Laulo v. Rehm

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary S. Laulo (Contestant), pro se, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, her challenge to primary election results, § 115.526, RSMo 1994. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.