State v. Inge
State v. Inge
934 S.W.2d 21; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1851
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Inge
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals after sentencing for forcible sodomy and denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. We affirm the conviction, Rule 30.25(b), and denial of Rule 29.15 relief, Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.