Ruzicka ex rel. Ruzicka v. Mandrafino
Ruzicka ex rel. Ruzicka v. Mandrafino
934 S.W.2d 36; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1883; 1996 WL 667965
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Ruzicka ex rel. Ruzicka v. Mandrafino
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Thomas R. Ruzicka (Father) appeals from a judgment and decree entered by the trial court in a paternity action. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.