Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Pitts

State v. Pitts
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 15, 1996 · Crahan, Grimm, Hoff
935 S.W.2d 687; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1711; 1996 WL 593892 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Pitts

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment and sentence entered following her conviction by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.211 RSMo 1989 Cum.Supp. and from the denial of her motion to vacate the judgment and sentence pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.