Missouri Court of Appeals, 1996

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 10, 1996 · Dowd, Gaertner, Russell

936 S.W.2d 178; 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2006; 1996 WL 705838 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction by a jury of forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to consecutive twenty year terms of imprisonment.1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

. As appellant's brief raises no issues pertaining to the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing, his appeal from this judgment is deemed abandoned. State v. Gaines, 807 S.W.2d 678 n. 1 (Mo.App. E.D. 1991).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.