Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

State v. Bailey

State v. Bailey
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 18, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
938 S.W.2d 667; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 234; 1997 WL 63451 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James Bailey (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County after a jury found him guilty of one count of driving while intoxicated, RSMo § 577.010 (1994). Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal files and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Likewise, we find the decision of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential pur*668pose, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.