Hardester v. State
Hardester v. State
939 S.W.2d 58; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 311; 1997 WL 90936
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hardester v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the motion court’s partial denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.