State v. Mills
State v. Mills
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the judgment on her conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.