Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

State v. Mooring

State v. Mooring
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
941 S.W.2d 767; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 446; 1997 WL 124202 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Mooring

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. The court found defendant to be a Class X offender and sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of twenty-five years for assault and five years for armed criminal action. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.