Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

State v. Hill

State v. Hill
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 8, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
943 S.W.2d 312; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 592; 1997 WL 160312 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lawrence Hill (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County after a jury found him guilty of two counts of sale of controlled substance, RSMo 195.211 (Cum.Supp. 1993). Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal files and find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. We further find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.