Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Rayford v. State

Rayford v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 8, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
943 S.W.2d 313; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 614; 1997 WL 160317 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Rayford v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.