Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Kinnikin v. Fenton

Kinnikin v. Fenton
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 1997 · Ahrens, Blackmar, Crandall
943 S.W.2d 808; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 433; 1997 WL 124159 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Kinnikin v. Fenton

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Marianne Kinnikin, appeals from the trial court’s judgment sustaining defendants’, William Fenton and Darlene Fenton, motion for summary judgment in this action arising when defendants’ dog bit plaintiff. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished, for their use only, with a memorandum explaining the reasons for this decision.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.