Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 29, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
945 S.W.2d 39; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 735; 1997 WL 206195 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Hicks v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Everlee Hicks appeals from the motion court’s judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing.1 He alleges the motion court erred when it denied the motion because the record clearly shows his counsel was ineffective by failing to request a change of venue before his guilty plea. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

. This court remanded the original dismissal for an evidentiary hearing in Hicks v. State, 918 S.W.2d 385 (Mo.App. E.D. 1996).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑