Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Labantschnig v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc.

Labantschnig v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 27, 1997 · Crahan, Grimm, Hoff
945 S.W.2d 699; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 969; 1997 WL 274211 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Labantschnig v. Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Labantschnig appeals from a judgment dismissing his libel and invasion of privacy claims against Kenworth of St. Louis, Inc. and J.W. Ackerman (both referred to as respondents) upon the granting of respondents’ motion to dismiss. That judgment resolved all of Labantschnig’s claims against respondents.1

No error of law appears in the judgment. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

. After the trial court entered judgment on La-bantschnig’s claims against respondents, the only remaining defendant, Earle J. Niederluecke, filed a motion for clarification and to dismiss. In December 1996, the trial judge granted that motion and clarified the earlier dismissal applied to all parties "such that the entire case is final for appeal purposes.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑