Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

State v. Heidebur

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard

946 S.W.2d 273; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 994; 1997 WL 289370 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Heidebur v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s assessment to a prison term of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.