Sales v. State
Sales v. State
947 S.W.2d 128; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1109; 1997 WL 342918
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Sales v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant claims the trial court erred in denying his Rule 24,035 Motion because his plea lacked voluntariness in that he was unaware that in the event his probation was revoked, he would have to serve the full suspended sentence, and that his probation could be revoked for failure to follow a directive initiated by his probation officer. Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.