Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Parsons v. State

Parsons v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 15, 1997 · Dowd, Gaertner, Reinhard
948 S.W.2d 279; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1296; 1997 WL 400076 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Parsons v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jimmy Parsons, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.085 motion as untimely filed. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. The time limits of Rule 24.035 have been found valid, mandatory, and reasonable. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo.banc 1989). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.