Jefferson v. State
Jefferson v. State
950 S.W.2d 325; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1520; 1997 WL 523889
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Jefferson v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Nathaniel Jefferson (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.