Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Bollinger v. Kellogg

Bollinger v. Kellogg
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 28, 1997 · Ahrens, Crandall, Karohl
953 S.W.2d 954; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1848; 1997 WL 664906 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Bollinger v. Kellogg

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would not have precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order. 1-4 Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.