Prescott v. State
Prescott v. State
954 S.W.2d 475; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1514; 1997 WL 523888
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Prescott v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant, Walter Edward Prescott, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.