Sexton v. State
Sexton v. State
954 S.W.2d 664; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833; 1997 WL 665466
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Sexton v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
John D. Sexton appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that Mr. Sexton’s motion was untimely filed and, therefore, affirm the motion court’s ruling. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.