Sexton v. State
Sexton v. State
954 S.W.2d 664; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833; 1997 WL 665466
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
John D. Sexton appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that Mr. Sexton’s motion was untimely filed and, therefore, affirm the motion court’s ruling. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.