Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 16, 1997 · Gaertner, Grimm, Pudlowski

955 S.W.2d 778; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Foster v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Daniel W. Foster, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the *779reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.