Cullop v. Director of Revenue
Cullop v. Director of Revenue
956 S.W.2d 405; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2043
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Cullop v. Director of Revenue
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s revocation of her driver’s license because her blood alcohol content was above the legal limit of .10 percent. See, Section 302.505.1 RSMo (1994). We affirm.
The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.