Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Kierst v. P.P.

Kierst v. P.P.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 9, 1997 · Smith, Spinden, Stith
956 S.W.2d 455; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2094; 1997 WL 754579 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Kierst v. P.P.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant P.P. appeals the trial court’s termination of her parental rights to her two children, F.AW. and P.L.W., claiming that the trial court’s ruling was against the weight of the evidence. We find that the trial *456court’s order terminating P.P.’s parental rights was supported by substantial competent evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑