Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997

Boersig v. State

Boersig v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 18, 1997 · Ahrens, Crandall, Karohl
959 S.W.2d 862; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1985; 1997 WL 713408 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Boersig v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Boersig, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.