Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 27, 1998 · Gaertner, Grimm, Pudlowski
959 S.W.2d 943; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 156; 1998 WL 25377 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Robinson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record provided on appeal and we conclude the motion court’s finding is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, *944however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑