Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Montez v. State

Montez v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 24, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Russell
962 S.W.2d 457; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 830; 1998 WL 72526 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Montez v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to one count of burglary in the first degree in violation of section 569.160 RSMo 1994. Defendant was *458convicted and sentenced to a term of ten years of incarceration. Following conviction, defendant filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Defendant appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion and his request for a hearing.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.