Young v. State
Young v. State
963 S.W.2d 473; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 425; 1998 WL 100339
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Young v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.