Hardy v. State
Hardy v. State
963 S.W.2d 475; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 430; 1998 WL 109830
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hardy v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. He concedes his motion was filed out of time. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); State v. Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d 1, 16 (Mo. banc 1992). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.