Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Washington v. State

Washington v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 17, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Russell
963 S.W.2d 482; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 461; 1998 WL 113858 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Washington v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.