Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Poynter v. State

Poynter v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 31, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Russell
964 S.W.2d 246; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 637; 1998 WL 148859 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Poynter v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Poynter, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.