Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Penton v. State

Penton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 17, 1998 · Gaertner, Grimm, Pudlowski
964 S.W.2d 464; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 292; 1998 WL 60947 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Penton v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We *465have reviewed the record on appeal briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.