Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Whitehead v. State

Whitehead v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 17, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Russell
964 S.W.2d 465; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 301; 1998 WL 65778 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Whitehead v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Whitehead, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 29.16 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant filed the motion after his convictions for second degree murder and armed criminal action.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.