Phu Tran v. State
Phu Tran v. State
965 S.W.2d 300; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 291
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Phu Tran v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Phu Tran, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.