In Interest of J.A. v. D.C.
In Interest of J.A. v. D.C.
967 S.W.2d 127; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 359
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
In Interest of J.A. v. D.C.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mother appeals from two judgments terminating her parental rights to her children, J.A. and A.A. We find the judgments are supported by substantial evidence, are not against the weight of the evidence, and do not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.