Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Evans v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products

Evans v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided July 28, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Russell
971 S.W.2d 936; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1479; 1998 WL 419837 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Evans v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a ruling of the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission denying Evans benefits under a worker’s compensation claim. The Commission affirmed the determination of an Administrative Law Judge, who ruled that Evans failed to give actual notice to his employer and failed to prove that his employer was not prejudiced by the lack of actual notice.

The order of the administrative agency is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.