Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Young v. Schoemehl

Young v. Schoemehl
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 5, 1998 · Gaertner, Grimm, Pudlowski
972 S.W.2d 495; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 855; 1998 WL 220186 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Young v. Schoemehl

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a two-count petition against defendants alleging breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. Defendants’ filed a summary judgment motion, which the trial court granted. Plaintiff appeals; we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.