Smith v. State
Smith v. State
972 S.W.2d 521; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 891; 1998 WL 240171
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Joseph H. Smith, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find that the motion court’s judgment is based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.