Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998

Cadice v. Maupin

Cadice v. Maupin
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 25, 1998 · Crane, Dowd, Hoff
975 S.W.2d 476; 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1562; 1998 WL 527223 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cadice v. Maupin

Opinion of the Court

*477 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Coyne appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for Cadice in a breach of contract action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.